African American and Latina adolescent females need extensive
support for developing and implementing career plans. There is
a need to provide female adolescents of color with a career education
that will enable both economic self-sufficiency and personal fulfillment.
ERIC
Clearinghouse on Urban Education
by Jeanne Weiler
Low-income African American and Latina adolescent females need
extensive support for developing and implementing career plans.
Many reside in economically depressed inner-cities where access
to decent schools and opportunities for employment are severely
limited. Thus they may lack academic skills and career-related
experiences, and perceive narrow career opportunities for themselves,
which combine to pose formidable obstacles to obtaining future
jobs or careers (De Leon, 1996).
In fact, unemployment rates for young African American and Latina
women are higher than for white females or males of all ethnic/racial
backgrounds; Latina adolescent girls drop out of school prematurely
more often than other youth; the numbers of African American and
Latina females heading households are steadily increasing, as
are their poverty rates; and the gap in earnings between high
school dropouts and high school graduates continues to increase
dramatically (U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1990;
U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1996).
There is, therefore, an urgent need to provide female adolescents
of color with a career education that will enable both economic
self-sufficiency and personal fulfillment. This digest discusses
ways for schools and other institutions to provide such an education.
The
Career Development Process
Much
of the past research on career development has been conducted
on groups of young white men, although career experts now question
its applicability to development of career programs for women
and racial and ethnic minorities. Traditional models of career
development do not take into account the complex realities of
women's career choices, preparation, and working lives (Fitzgerald,
Fassinger, & Betz, 1995 ). The succession of career behaviors
for women is far more complex than for men, because women frequently
interrupt education and career preparation in order to integrate
work and family life. They also must strive to overcome obstacles
such as gender discrimination and sex stereotyping. Furthermore,
for many people, particularly low-income, the traditional concepts
of vocational decision-making and development are not that useful
when their economic survival is the main motivation for getting
a job.
Potentially more useful and relevant to understanding the career
development of women of color, working class people, and others
whose vocational behavior does not fit into existing frameworks
has been the application of Bandura's general
social cognitive theory to career development (1986). Social
cognitive career theory (SCCT) considers several variables that
guide people in their career development, such as self-efficacy,
outcome expectation, and personal goals. It emphasizes the interplay
between these psychological factors with other characteristics
of a person (e.g., gender, race, ethnicity) and their environments
(e.g., support, barriers) (Lent & Brown,
1996). For example, within the SCCT framework, five areas
can be considered relevant to understanding the career development
of women of color: their knowledge of the work world, family factors,
environmental factors, the impact of socialization, and the impact
of sexism and racism. Similarly, from a social cognitive perspective,
Hackett and Byars (1996) discuss
the impact of typical socialization experiences of African American
women on career-related self-efficacy, and suggest implications
for career counseling (discussed below).
Limitations
on Young Women's Career Choices
Through gender
role stereotyping, girls and boys learn early which occupations
are suitable for them, with the result of limiting career choices
and planning. In addition, girls suffer from limited career awareness
because they lack information on nontraditional career choices,
particularly those related to mathematics, science, and engineering.
From an early age girls choose not to, and are not encouraged
to, take courses in school that would prepare them for careers
in these fields. Low self-esteem, lack of female role models,
low parental expectations, stereotypes of scientists, and lack
of hands-on experiences in science all contribute to girls' development
of negative attitudes towards math and science (Bailey,
1992 ).
Effective
Career Development Programs for Young Women
Although a
variety of approaches and specialized programs exist today in
schools to prepare youth for future careers, the majority of low-income
urban girls are not enrolled in them, and many of the programs
do not directly address their needs. Interventions shown to be
effective with low-income African American and Latina adolescent
females comprise the following components:
School-Based
Initiatives
Teachers can play an important role in providing career development
support for females even though it has not been a significant
responsibility of school-based staff or a subject of special training.
Indeed, a study on the career expectations of Mexican American
girls found that those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds (also
associated with lower levels of acculturation) perceived their
parents as less encouraging of their career aspirations and support
from teachers as extremely important (McWhirter
& Hackett, 1993).
Collaborations
Between Institutions
Collaborations between schools, agencies, and higher education
institutions can develop especially relevant programs. For example,
the Girl Scout Council of Greater New York and The Bronx Zoo have
jointly designed a program to introduce urban adolescent girls
to the natural sciences and increase their awareness of the range
of career options related to wildlife sciences and conservation
biology.
A collaborative effort by the University of Texas at El Paso,
a local YMCA, and three local school districts has created a successful
program for Latina girls and their mothers: The Mother-Daughter
Program (Tinajera, 1991). It is designed
to encourage participants to value education, improve academic
and life skills, develop leadership potential, and aspire to careers.
The program includes mothers because their expectations, involvement,
and role-modeling will have lasting effects on their daughters'
educational development. Often the mothers return to school to
complete their education, providing an important example to their
daughters.
Several model programs for low-income African American adolescent
girls have also been developed. Steppin' Up and Movin' On, a counseling
program providing career education for urban, non-college-bound
female students, emphasizes four areas: (1) individual assessment-helping
students become aware of individual aptitudes and abilities; (2)
education and career information-examining careers from a broad
societal perspective and their specific implications for African
American females; (3) skill-building exercises; and (4) integrated
experiences with peers and counselors (Fisher,
1982). NEW PASS was developed as a model program to improve
African American girls' awareness of nontraditional careers (Kohler,
1987). Its curriculum provides activities to expand participants'
knowledge of nontraditional career options, build self-esteem,
develop problem-solving and decision-making skills, and increase
their awareness of the importance of making life plans. The curriculum
also covers special issues in participants' lives, such as parenting,
male-female relationships, and sexual violence.
Access
to Career Information
Interventions should include current and accurate information
about the nature of different careers and occupations, career
preparation and training, and lines of progression leading to
job advancement. Many low-income African American and Latina girls
lack such an education because they are isolated from the work
world, and because there are limited employment opportunities
for them and for others in their community (Smith,
1983).
Gender
Equality in Occupational Information
Persistent sex-role stereotyping of occupations continues to circumscribe
young women's employment choices. Young African American and Latina
women need to be taught to critically examine how gender role
socialization impacts on their career goals, and be helped to
explore higher paying "nontraditional" careers for women.
For example, Taking Your Place, a two-week summer program designed
to encourage nontraditional career choices for adolescent girls
in Wilmington, NC, offers participants the opportunity to expand
their career choices as well as to develop a positive self-image
(Rea-Poteat & Martin, 1991).
The project includes field trips to local businesses to highlight
technological occupations; classroom instruction; lectures and
discussions involving women in nontraditional occupations; and
hands-on applications, such as building an AM/FM radio, collecting
marine animals, and changing an automobile tire.
Skills
to Cope with Racism, Sexism, and Discrimination
It is critical to help young low-income minority women understand
and overcome the effects of perceived barriers and negative outcomes
on their own beliefs in their career abilities, interests, and
goals. They need to build skills to identify racism, sexism, and
discrimination; and to develop effective coping strategies for
dealing with discrimination and social barriers that can limit
their career and educational development and participation (Hackett
& Byars, 1996).
Role
Models and Mentors
The most effective kind of role model intervention for African
American girls is often exposure to models similar in age and
social backgrounds (Hackett & Byars,
1996). Successful coping behaviors (e.g., discussing frustrations
and problems) that are actively demonstrated by similar-age peers,
rather than adults, may be more likely to influence their skill
development, and exposure to college students can enhance career
awareness. Outcomes for low-income female adolescents can also
be enhanced by mentors (Rhodes & Davis,
1996). Experience has indicated that African American girls
who identified with "natural mentors" (extended family members)
were more likely to be engaged in activities related to career
goals, suggesting that parents, extended family members, and community
members need to be recruited to provide support and mentoring.
Conclusion
Programmatic
changes in schools and counseling departments, along with creative
collaborations among schools and other institutions in urban areas,
are needed to fully meet the career development needs of African
American and Latina girls. In addition, given the obstacles faced
by many of the students, these organized effects should be combined
with personal encouragement and support from family, teachers,
and community members.
References
Bailey,
S. (1992). Shortchanging girls, shortchanging America: A call
to action. Washington, DC: Women's Educational Foundation, American
Association of University Women.
(ERIC
Abstract)
Bandura,
A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social
cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bingham,
R.P., & Ward, C.M. (1994). Career counseling with ethnic minority
women. In W.B. Walsh & S.H. Osipow (Eds.), Career counseling for
women (pp.165-95). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
De
León, B. (1996). Career development of Hispanic adolescent
girls. In B. Leadbeater & N. Way (Eds.), Urban girls: Resisting
stereotypes, creating identities (pp.380-398). New York: New York
University Press.
Fisher,
P.A. (1982). Steppin' up and movin' on: A career education program
for the urban, non-college bound student. Washington, DC: Women's
Educational Equity Act.
(ERIC
Abstract)
Fitzgerald,
L.F., Fassinger R.E., & Betz, N.E. (1995). Theoretical advances
in the study of women's career development. In W.B. Walsh & S.H.
Osipow (Eds.), Handbook of vocational psychology: Theory, research,
and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hackett,
G., & Betz, N.E. (1981). A self-efficacy approach to the career
development of women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18(3), 326-339.
(ERIC
Abstract)
Hackett,
G., & Byars, A.M. (1996). Social cognitive theory and the career
development of African American women. The Career Development
Quarterly, 44(4), 322-340.
(ERIC
Abstract)
Kohler,
J. (1987). NEW PASS: Nontraditional education for women, paths
to economic self-sufficiency: A career awareness program for economically
disadvantaged girls and young women. Springfield, IL: State Board
of Education.
(ERIC
Abstract)
Lent,
R.W., & Brown, S.D. (1996). Social cognitive approach to career
development: An overview. The Career Development Quarterly, 44(4),
310-321.
(ERIC
Abstract)
McWhirter,
E.H., & Hackett, G. (1993). Causal models of the career commitment
and aspirations of Mexican-American high school girls. Paper presented
at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association,
Toronto, Canada.
Rea-Poteat,
M.B., & Martin, P.F. (1991). Taking your place: A summer program
to encourage non-traditional career choices for adolescent girls.
The Career Development Quarterly, 40(2), 182-188.
(ERIC
Abstract)
Rhodes,
J.E., & Davis, A.B. (1996). Supportive ties between nonparent
adults and urban adolescent girls. In B. Leadbeater & N. Way (Eds.),
Urban girls: Resisting stereotypes, creating identities (pp.213-225).
New York: New York University Press.
Smith,
E.J. (1981). The career development of young black females: The
forgotten group. Youth and Society, 12(3), 277-312.
(ERIC
Abstract)
Tinajero,
J.V. (1991) Raising career aspirations of Hispanic girls. Fastback
320. Bloomington: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
(ERIC
Abstract)
U.S.
Bureau of the Census. 1996. Statistical abstract of the United
States: 1996 (116th edition). Washington, DC: U.S. Printing Office.
U.S.
Bureau of the Census. (1990). Current population survey. Washington,
DC: U.S. Printing Office.
ERIC
Clearinghouse on Urban Education, Institute for Urban and Minority
Education, Box 40, Teachers College, Columbia University, New
York, NY 10027, (800) 601-4868. Erwin Flaxman, Director. Wendy
Schwartz, Managing Editor.
This Digest was developed by the ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban Education
with funding from the Office of Educational Research and Improvement,
U.S. Department of Education, under contract no. RR93002016. The
opinions in this Digest do not necessarily reflect the position
or policies of OERI or the Department of Education.